Filter results
You can narrow down the results using the filters
Content type
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – Public Health Association of Australia
The Public Health Association of Australia sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development
Western Australia's Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – University of Queensland's IBC
The University of Queensland's Institutional Biosafety Committee sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – National Farmers' Federation
The National Farmers' Federation sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – Department of the Environment and Energy
The Australian Government's Department of the Environment and Energy sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment
Tasmania's Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – Ms Diana Rickard and Mr Greg Chapman
Ms Diana Rickard and Mr Greg Chapman sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – Crabtree Agricultural Consulting and Green Blueprint
Crabtree Agricultural Consulting and Green Blueprint sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – DuPont Pioneer
DuPont Pioneer sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – AusBiotech
AusBiotech sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – Department of Agriculture and Water Resources
The Australian Government's Department of Agriculture and Water Resources sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – Recombinetics
Recombinetics sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – Western Australian organisations
Several organisations from Western Australia sent this joint submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat. They are listed in the description below.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – Earth First Conservation Projects
Earth First Conservation Projects sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – MADGE Australia
Mothers Are Demystifying Genetic Engineering (MADGE) Australia sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – Council of Rural Research and Development Corporations
The Council of Rural Research and Development Corporations sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – Agribusiness Australia
Agribusiness Australia sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – Dr Mary-Faeth Chenery
Dr Mary-Faeth Chenery sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 1 – Submission – South Australian Government
The South Australian Government sent this submission for the phase 1 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Terms of reference
This document sets out the terms of reference for the 2017 review of the National Gene Technology Scheme.
2017 review – Phase 1 consultation submissions
The National Gene Technology Scheme received these submissions for the first consultation phase of the third review. It excludes those made on a confidential basis. Submissions to this consultation phase closed on 29 September 2017.
2011 review – All governments' response
All Australian governments responded to the final review report from the second review of the Gene Technology Act 2000.
2011 review – Final report
The second review of the Gene Technology Act 2000 was done in 2011. This report outlines the results of the review and includes 16 recommendations.
2011 review – Terms of reference
This document sets out the terms of reference for the second review of the Gene Technology Act 2000.
Guidelines for emergency response under the Gene Technology Act 2000 and the Gene Technology Agreement
Guidance on when and how the emergency provisions of the Gene Technology Act 2000, and the relevant clauses in the Gene Technology Agreement 2001, will be used to create an Emergency Dealing Determination.